Back to Blog
GuideEducationChallenges

1-Step vs 2-Step Prop Firm Challenges — Which Should You Choose?

Flux TradingFebruary 22, 20264 min read7 views

One of the first decisions you'll face when choosing a prop firm is the challenge format: 1-Step or 2-Step? Each has clear advantages and trade-offs that can significantly impact your chances of getting funded.

How 1-Step Challenges Work

A 1-Step evaluation has a single phase. You need to hit a profit target (usually 8-10%) while staying within the maximum drawdown limit. Once you pass, you get a funded account.

Advantages of 1-Step:

  • Faster to funded — only one phase to clear
  • Lower total fees in some cases
  • Less time commitment — hit the target and you're done
  • Simpler rules — one set of targets to focus on
  • Disadvantages of 1-Step:

  • Higher profit targets — firms often set 8-10% in a single phase
  • Less room for error — no second phase to prove consistency
  • Tighter rules in some cases to compensate for fewer phases

  • How 2-Step Challenges Work

    A 2-Step evaluation has two phases:

  • Phase 1: Hit a profit target (usually 8-10%)
  • Phase 2: Hit a lower target (usually 5%) to confirm consistency
  • Only after passing both phases do you receive funding.

    Advantages of 2-Step:

  • Lower per-phase targets — 5% in Phase 2 is very manageable
  • Proves consistency — firms trust you more
  • More forgiving — two chances to show your skills
  • Often cheaper than 1-step for the same account size
  • Disadvantages of 2-Step:

  • Takes longer — two phases can mean weeks of trading
  • More fee risk — if you fail Phase 2, you might need to restart
  • Psychological fatigue — maintaining discipline across two phases

  • Which Firms Offer What?

    Best 1-Step Challenge Firms:

  • Apex Trader Funding — $17 entry, 100% profit split on first $25K, futures focused
  • Topstep — $49 entry, 90% split, NFA Member, Express Funded option
  • Breakout — $49 entry, up to 100% split, crypto only, daily payouts
  • Best 2-Step Challenge Firms:

  • FTMO — $89 entry, up to 90% split, the industry standard
  • FundedNext — $59 entry, up to 95% split, no time limits
  • Funding Pips — $49 entry, up to 100% split, zero payout denials
  • Firms That Offer Both:

  • MyFundedFX — 1-Step, 2-Step, and even 3-Step options
  • FTMO — recently added a 1-Step alongside their classic 2-Step
  • Breakout — both formats available for crypto

  • 1-Step vs 2-Step: Side by Side

    Feature1-Step2-Step
    Phases12
    Typical profit target8-10%Phase 1: 8-10%, Phase 2: 5%
    Time to fundedFasterSlower
    DifficultyHigher per phaseLower per phase
    CostSometimes higherSometimes lower
    Best forExperienced tradersBeginners

    Which Format Is Better for Beginners?

    If you're new to prop trading, we recommend starting with a 2-Step challenge. Here's why:

  • The lower Phase 2 target (5%) gives you room to build confidence
  • You learn to trade consistently across multiple phases
  • Failure in Phase 1 costs the same either way, but 2-Step gives you a second confirmation phase
  • Our pick for beginners: FundedNext — no time limits mean you can take as long as you need, and the 95% profit split rewards your patience.


    Which Format Is Better for Experienced Traders?

    If you're a profitable trader who just needs capital, 1-Step is the way to go:

  • Get funded faster and start earning sooner
  • Less time spent in evaluation means more time making money
  • Simpler process with fewer variables
  • Our pick for experienced traders: Apex Trader Funding — $17 entry with 100% profit split on first $25K is simply unbeatable.


    The Bottom Line

    There's no universally "better" format — it depends on your experience level, trading style, and risk tolerance.

  • Choose 1-Step if you're confident in your edge and want the fastest path to funding
  • Choose 2-Step if you want lower targets per phase and prefer a structured evaluation
  • Use our Prop Firm Matcher to find the perfect challenge format for your trading style.